Dec 4 2008
12:15PM
EST
DOJ Ace: Google Dodged Monopoly Lawsuit By Three Hours
Sam Gustin writes: Newsflash: The feds think Google has a monopoly over search advertising. (Ya' think?)
So it's a good thing Google ditched its controversial ad partnership with Yahoo, because the search juggernaut was just three hours away from being sued by the Justice Department, according to the ace antitrust litigator brought on by the feds to investigate the deal.
"We were going to file the complaint at a certain time during the day," Sandy Litvack told AmLawDaily, a legal blog produced by the American Lawyer magazine. "We told them we were going to file the complaint at that time of day. Three hours before, they told us they were abandoning the agreement."
Google had little appetite for a legal battle with the Justice Department, so the company bailed on the plan, leaving Yahoo out to dry.
"We're of course disappointed that this deal won't be moving ahead," Google's top lawyer David Drummond wrote. "But we're not going to let the prospect of a lengthy legal battle distract us from our core mission. That would be like trying to drive down the road of innovation with the parking brake on."
And what a distraction it would have been.
Litvack revealed that the feds were poised to charge Google with violations of the Sherman Antitrust Act, which prohibits deals that restrain or try to monopolize trade.
"It would have ended up also alleging that Google had a monopoly and that [the Yahoo deal] would have furthered their monopoly," Litvack said.
Litvack played coy when asked whether the Justice Department's willingness to sue Google signals that the company might find itself in the feds' antitrust crosshairs again.
No matter. He didn't really need to come out and say it. It seems clear that if Google continues to grow its search ad market share, it's facing a date with antitrust destiny.
Google may feel lucky to have have dodged a bullet this time. Next time, the company might not so fortunate.
So it's a good thing Google ditched its controversial ad partnership with Yahoo, because the search juggernaut was just three hours away from being sued by the Justice Department, according to the ace antitrust litigator brought on by the feds to investigate the deal.
"We were going to file the complaint at a certain time during the day," Sandy Litvack told AmLawDaily, a legal blog produced by the American Lawyer magazine. "We told them we were going to file the complaint at that time of day. Three hours before, they told us they were abandoning the agreement."
Google had little appetite for a legal battle with the Justice Department, so the company bailed on the plan, leaving Yahoo out to dry.
"We're of course disappointed that this deal won't be moving ahead," Google's top lawyer David Drummond wrote. "But we're not going to let the prospect of a lengthy legal battle distract us from our core mission. That would be like trying to drive down the road of innovation with the parking brake on."
And what a distraction it would have been.
Litvack revealed that the feds were poised to charge Google with violations of the Sherman Antitrust Act, which prohibits deals that restrain or try to monopolize trade.
"It would have ended up also alleging that Google had a monopoly and that [the Yahoo deal] would have furthered their monopoly," Litvack said.
Litvack played coy when asked whether the Justice Department's willingness to sue Google signals that the company might find itself in the feds' antitrust crosshairs again.
No matter. He didn't really need to come out and say it. It seems clear that if Google continues to grow its search ad market share, it's facing a date with antitrust destiny.
Google may feel lucky to have have dodged a bullet this time. Next time, the company might not so fortunate.
See more in
Loading...
Thank you for registering as a Portfolio.com Insider. Your comment has been added.
Create Your Public ProfileRecent Blog Posts
- Calls to Postpone DTV
- Jan 8 2009 1:35PM EST
- First Bytes: At CES, Ballmer Takes the Stage
- Jan 8 2009 9:05AM EST
- Last Bytes: Next Up, CES
- Jan 7 2009 5:18PM EST
- 60 Million Want Their DTV and Can't Get It
- Jan 7 2009 12:43PM EST
- First Bytes: The New Madoff
- Jan 7 2009 9:26AM EST
- Last Bytes: Apple Happenings
- Jan 6 2009 5:27PM EST
- Apple Plans for iTunes: Signs of Retreat?
- Jan 6 2009 1:40PM EST
- Comcast Mends Its Ways
- Jan 6 2009 12:15PM EST
- First Bytes: Digital TV Conversion Holdup
- Jan 6 2009 8:25AM EST
- Last Bytes: Hacked in 140 Characters or Less
- Jan 5 2009 5:07PM EST
- The Sorry State of Videogames
- Jan 5 2009 2:20PM EST
- Adobe's "Flash Lite" Coming to TV
- Jan 5 2009 10:04AM EST
- Steve Jobs Speaks Out on His Health
- Jan 5 2009 9:55AM EST
- First Bytes: Trade Show Hullabaloo
- Jan 5 2009 8:46AM EST
- Last Bytes: Mogul Feud, Zune Mystery
- Dec 31 2008 2:17PM EST
Categories
Links
- Mark Cuban's blog

- TechCrunch

- GigaOM

- Engadget

- USA TODAY Tech

- Romenesko

- BuzzTracker Tech

- Roger McGuinn's Folk Den

- Maney's band on MySpace

- Spiedies, mmmm

- Somewhat Frank's tech conference list

- Tom Foremski

- Fred Wilson

- Pandora

- SciTech Daily

- Todd Bishop's Microsoft Blog

- Steven Johnson

- The Long Tail

- paidContent

- John Battelle's SearchBlog

- Marc Andreessen

- Kevin's site

- Kevin Maney & His Briefs on CD Baby







